<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C3: Collaborating For Health &#187; Government action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c3health.org/category/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c3health.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Diabetes &#8216;Question Time&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/diabetes-question-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/diabetes-question-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO and IGO action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday 17 January, C3 Collaborating for Health, Diabetes UK and SilverStar co-hosted a Question Time-style event in Westminster Central Hall, in front of an invited audience of around 150 people. The event was funded by Novo Nordisk. The panel was made up of Grace Vanterpool (a specialist diabetes nurse), three members of parliament – Stephen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2876" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2876" title="Panelists at Diabetes Question Time" src="http://www.c3health.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/QT-speakers-group-pic-150x150.png" alt="Panelists at Diabetes Question Time" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Panelists at Diabetes Question Time</p></div>
<p>On Tuesday 17 January, C3 Collaborating for Health, Diabetes UK and SilverStar co-hosted a Question Time-style event in Westminster Central Hall, in front of an invited audience of around 150 people. The event was funded by Novo Nordisk. The panel was made up of Grace Vanterpool (a specialist diabetes nurse), three members of parliament – Stephen Dorrell, Keith Vaz and Adrian Sanders – the chief executive of Diabetes UK Baroness Barbara Young, and Viggo Birch, vice-president of Novo Nordisk Europe. It was facilitated by Stephen Dixon of Sky News, and closed with a short presentation from Paul Burstow, minister of state for care services.</p>
<p>The audience was made up of health professionals, policy-makers and others – and both panel and audience included people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The event was covered on Twitter (#diabetesqt).</p>
<p><strong>Questions</strong> at the event included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Will commissioning lead to fragmented care?</li>
<li>Will the Outcomes Framework work as a catalyst to help people with diabetes or not?</li>
<li>How can prevention methods be improved?</li>
<li>How best to care for children with diabetes</li>
<li>How to encourage sharing of best practice</li>
<li>The problem of limited access to pumps</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_2875" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2875" title="Voting at Diabetes Question Time" src="http://www.c3health.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Voting-at-Diabetes-QT-150x150.png" alt="Voting at Diabetes Question Time" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Voting at Diabetes Question Time</p></div>
<p>The audience were actively involved throughout the event. First, all those attending were asked to take part in two votes during the event:</p>
<ul>
<li>Will people be more involved in their care in the new system envisaged by the new Bill? (which saw a small majority who felt that people will be more involved)</li>
<li>Will diabetes care have improved by 2025? (which also saw a ‘yes’ majority).</li>
</ul>
<p>On arrival, the audience were all invited to participate in a short poll to ascertain<strong> </strong><strong>views on what should be the top three priorities for the NHS in diabetes</strong>, and the results were illustrative of the need to ensure that people with the disease should be closely consulted:</p>
<ul>
<li>Among people<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">with</span> diabetes, supporting self-management was seen as the highest priority (40%), followed by identification and prevention (23%), education (23%), and specialist nursing (10%).</li>
<li>Among those<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">without</span> diabetes, the priorities were different: identification and prevention (43%), reducing variations in access to care and services (23%), and supporting self management (19%).</li>
<li>Averaged across the audience as a whole, the top three priorities were identification and prevention (37.5%), supporting self-management (25%), and reducing variations in access to care and services (17%).</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2877" title="Panel photo banner Diabetes QT" src="http://www.c3health.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Panel-photo-banner-Diabetes-QY.jpg" alt="Panel photo banner Diabetes QT" width="549" height="279" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/diabetes-question-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dutch smoking ban relaxed</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/dutch-smoking-ban-relaxed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/dutch-smoking-ban-relaxed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported recently in the Lancet, the government of The Netherlands, which is a member of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, is pulling away from tobacco control.
The Dutch government banned smoking at workplaces since 2004 and in most public places since 2008.  This move was particularly unpopular with small bars and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported recently in the <em>Lancet,</em> the government of The Netherlands, which is a member of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, is pulling away from tobacco control.</p>
<p>The Dutch government banned smoking at workplaces since 2004 and in most public places since 2008.  This move was particularly unpopular with small bars and innkeepers, who mounted a grassroots campaign aimed at toppling existing smoking legislation.  As a result, the primary Dutch organisation responsible for campaigning against smoking, STIVORO, will lose its €2.7 million funding by 2013 and will need to raise funs to continue operation.  In addition, pharmaceutical nicotine patches, previously dispensed through the public health services, will no longer be available fre of charge.  Although smoking rates are slightly down from 2001 when an estimated 30 per cent of the population were smokers, smoking remains popular in the Netherlands; 27 per cent of the population were smokers in 2010.</p>
<p>According to the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project, <em>Netherlands Survey</em>, smokers in the Netherlands are the least well informed or concerned about both the hazards of smoking and the dangers of second-hand smoke exposure of the 12 countries surveyed.</p>
<p><em>Sources</em>: <em>The Lancet</em> 379(9811): 121-2, 14 January 2012; The International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project, <em>Netherlands Survey</em>, March, 2011 <em>Report on Smokers’ Awareness of the Risks of Smoking and Second-hand Smoke; </em>STIVORO, Annual Report 2009—2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/dutch-smoking-ban-relaxed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for community health workers</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/the-case-for-community-health-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/the-case-for-community-health-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment and design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first NCD risk factor surveillance was conducted in Iran in 2004.  It is estimated that non-communicable diseases will account for 70 per cent of premature deaths in the country by 2020.
The Lancet published an article recently about the prevalence and treatment of two major chronic conditions: hypertension and diabetes.  Interestingly, though the prevalence of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first NCD risk factor surveillance was conducted in Iran in 2004.  It is estimated that non-communicable diseases will account for 70 per cent of premature deaths in the country by 2020.</p>
<p>The <em>Lancet </em>published an article recently about the prevalence and treatment of two major chronic conditions: hypertension and diabetes.  Interestingly, though the prevalence of chronic disease like diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some cancers is higher in urban areas, the article shows evidence that control and management of chronic conditions is better in rural areas and the Behyarz workers, who are well-trained community health workers, are largely attributed with developing and maintaining low rates of hypertension and diabetes in particular.  This community health model, which involves health education training of over two years, includes an emphasis on workers identifying new cases of disease and referring the new cases.</p>
<p>As is the case in many nations, the causes of death in Iran have shifted from infectious agents to NCD. Cardiovascular disease accounts for almost half of all deaths in Iran and cancer rates have soared; traffic-related deaths have also increased dramatically. <em>The Lancet</em> study shows the higher prevalence of CVD risk factors &#8211; hypertension and diabetes &#8211; in the context of urbanisation, increasingly sedentary lifestyles, changes away from a traditional Mediterranean diet and improved infectious disease control.  This study corroborates evidence from Ethiopia, Brazil, India and Bangladesh, which suggest that trained community health care workers and well-established guidelines can, in combination, be effective in NCD prevention and management.</p>
<p><em>Sources</em>: F. Habibzadeh, <em>The Lancet</em> 379(9180):  6-7, 7 January 2012; Asgari et al., <em>Iranian Journal of  Public Health</em> (2009) 38, Suppl. 1: 119-22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/the-case-for-community-health-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazil takes on leadership role</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/brazil-takes-on-leadership-role/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/brazil-takes-on-leadership-role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South and Central America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a population of 190 million people, including 17 million smokers, Brazil has taken the lead with a new law, signed by President Dilma Rousseff, which completely bans smoking in enclosed public places, including workplaces.  Going one step further, designated smoking areas in bars and public transportation facilities in large Brazilian cities that already had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a population of 190 million people, including 17 million smokers, Brazil has taken the lead with a new law, signed by President Dilma Rousseff, which completely bans smoking in enclosed public places, including workplaces.  Going one step further, designated smoking areas in bars and public transportation facilities in large Brazilian cities that already had partial bans in place will be entirely outlawed. The law also bans tobacco advertising in shops, raises taxes on all tobacco products, which will approach 55 per cent within four years, and requires that warnings are prominently displayed on both sides of tobacco packaging.</p>
<p>Tobacco, the world’s leading cause of preventable death, is estimated to be responsible for over 200,000 deaths each year in Brazil, including 45 per cent of heart-attack deaths and 30 per cent of deaths due to cancer. Smoking is the primary cause of many of the world’s preventable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, lung disease and cancers, killing 1/10 adults worldwide and is frequently the cause of the disease recorded as the cause of death, according to the WHO.  As Brazil is hosting both the 2014 Soccer World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games, the nation has a crucial example to set through its leadership role on this issue.</p>
<p><em>Sources:</em> <em>The Washington Post</em>,<em> </em>15 December 2011; Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, press release; Tobacco Free Center<em>, Tobacco Policy Status (pre-ban) </em>12/2011; World Health Organization &#8216;Top Ten Causes of Death Fact Sheet&#8217;, June 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/brazil-takes-on-leadership-role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more branded cigarettes</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-more-branded-cigarettes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-more-branded-cigarettes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising/marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business/industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today, 1 December 2011, all tobacco products in Australia will have to be sold in identical plain, brown packaging, devoid of logos, colours and branding. The legislation paving the way for this was passed on 21 November – the Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011 and Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today, 1 December 2011, all tobacco products in Australia will have to be sold in identical plain, brown packaging, devoid of logos, colours and branding. The legislation paving the way for this was passed on 21 November – the Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011 and Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011. It has been particularly welcomed by the Minister for Health and Ageing Nicola Roxon, who commented: ‘We know that packaging remains one of the last powerful marketing tools for tobacco companies to recruit new smokers to their deadly products. In the future, cigarette packets will serve only as a stark reminder of the devastating health effects of smoking.’ In September, Ms Roxon spoke in the plenary at the UN High-level Meeting on NCDs, at which she commented ‘The more that tobacco companies fight, the more we know we are on the right track’. Now, following the passage of this new legislation, she called on the tobacco companies to leave this latest move unchallenged, and accept the will of the parliament and the people.</p>
<p><em>Source</em>: health.gov.au, 21 November 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-more-branded-cigarettes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Action on sickness absence</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/action-on-sickness-absence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/action-on-sickness-absence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new UK review (click here  &#62;&#62;), published on 21 November and commissioned by the government in February, aims to combat the 140 million days lost to sickness absence in Great Britain every year, which costs employers £9 billion a year in sick pay and costs. It was written by Dame Carol Black (national director [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new UK review (click <a href="http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/welfare%2Dreform/sickness%2Dabsence%2Dreview/" target="_blank">here  &gt;&gt;</a>), published on 21 November and commissioned by the government in February, aims to combat the 140 million days lost to sickness absence in Great Britain every year, which costs employers £9 billion a year in sick pay and costs. It was written by Dame Carol Black (national director of health and work) and David Frost (former director-general of the British Chambers of Commerce), and analyses the sickness absence system in the UK and the impact that it has on employers, state and individuals, looking at the factors that cause and extend absenteeism. It provides insights into the problem and recommendations to improve the current system (the government will respond in the future).</p>
<p>Recommendations include:</p>
<ul>
<li>the option for employers to hold a ‘protected’, without-prejudice conversation with employees about their condition, as many are afraid of being taken to an employment tribunal;</li>
<li>expenditure to keep ill employees in work – e.g. medical treatment or rehabilitation – could attract tax relief;</li>
<li>a proposal for an independent assessment service that would assess individual’s health after four weeks off work, and find ways to help them back to work; and</li>
<li>a job-brokering service for those off work for 20 weeks or more, which could help those unable to return to work at their previous job.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Sources</em>: <em>Financial Times</em>, 21 November 2011 and <em>Health at Work: An Independent Review of Sickness Absence</em>, published 21 November 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/action-on-sickness-absence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No logo challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-logo-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-logo-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business/industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move designed to remove the glamour and appeal of smoking particular brands of cigarettes, the Australian parliament recently introduced legislation mandating a government proposed ban on branding and logos on all cigarettes and other tobacco packaging.  Once implemented, this will make the Australian stance on tobacco the toughest in the world. The ban [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move designed to remove the glamour and appeal of smoking particular brands of cigarettes, the Australian parliament recently introduced legislation mandating a government proposed ban on branding and logos on all cigarettes and other tobacco packaging.  Once implemented, this will make the Australian stance on tobacco the toughest in the world. The ban would commence in January 2012, less than three months away.  Tobacco companies Phillip Morris and British American Tobacco have been highly critical of the proposed changes and have run paid advertisements condemning the branding removal as a tool and technique of a ‘nanny state’.</p>
<p>Last April, the Australian government presented a proposal that involves requiring that all cigarettes sold be displayed without branded labels and in non-descript olive-green packaging, which smokers are reported to favour least, with graphic depictions of smoking-related illnesses.  Brand names will be displayed in a single, standard font and size. In October, Philip Morris, the cigarette manufacturer that holds eight of the top 15 selling brands, including the best-selling brand, Marlboro, lashed out at the proposal, and said they were preparing for legal battle if the plain-packaging bill becomes law.</p>
<p>The <em>Financial Times</em> reports that Hermann Waldeme, Phillip Morris’ CFO claims that there is &#8216;no evidence&#8217; that removing logos from packaging reduces smoking either in general or among youth &#8211; a claim made in spite of evidence from studies demonstrating that plain packaging both decreases brand appeal and general pleasure derived from smoking.  Tobacco companies have raised challenges around the ‘forced removal of trademarks’ in terms of both commercial and intellectual property law, and international law.  But Prime Minister Julia Gillard says that she will not be intimidated by big tobacco.</p>
<p>Sources: <em>Financial Times, </em>20 October 2011, BBC News online, 8 April 2011; <em> Sydney Morning Herald, </em>27 June 201<em>1; Tobacco Control (BMJ,&#8217;</em>Welcome to cardboard country: how plain packaging could change the subjective experience of smoking<em>&#8216; (</em>Melanie Wakefield, Centre for Behaviour Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/no-logo-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social determinants rise up the agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/social-determinants-rise-up-the-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/social-determinants-rise-up-the-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social determinants of health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From 19–21 October, heads of government and other ministers met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to discuss the importance of the social determinants of health, adopting – at the meeting’s conclusion – the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health (click here &#62;&#62; to read the Declaration).
The Declaration is grouped under a number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 19–21 October, heads of government and other ministers met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to discuss the importance of the social determinants of health, adopting – at the meeting’s conclusion – the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health (click <a href="http://www.who.int/sdhconference/declaration/Rio_political_declaration.pdf " target="_blank">here &gt;&gt;</a> to read the Declaration).</p>
<p>The Declaration is grouped under a number of headings:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Adopt better governance for health and development</strong>, including working across all sectors and levels of government, promote and strengthen universal access to social services, and provide access to affordable, quality medicine</li>
<li><strong>Promote participation in policy-making and implementation</strong>, including empowering local communities to contribute to policy-making, focusing particularly on health inequities faced by indigenous people, and sharing good practice</li>
<li><strong>Further reorient the health sector towards reducing health inequities</strong>, including maintaining and developing effective public health policies that address the social, ecoomic, environmental and behavioural determinants of health, strengthening health systems, and promoting dialogue and problem-solving across government</li>
<li><strong>Strengthen global governance and collaboration</strong>, including accelerating the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, taking forward the actions set out in the Political Declaration of the UN HLM on NCDs at local, national and international levels, and foster North–South and South–South cooperation in showcasing initiatives and transferring technology</li>
<li><strong>Monitor progress and increase accountability</strong>, including developing and implementing evidence-based measures of societal well-being, improving monitoring and sharing evidence</li>
</ul>
<p>It ends with a ‘<strong>call for global action</strong>’, including urging developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 percent of GNP for official development assistance by 2015.</p>
<p>1,200 people took part, with 120 countries represented at the meeting, with 60 health ministers present – a clear sign that this issue is rising up the agenda, with countries and even cities are beginning to take the ideas and make them their own, with Brazil having set up its own Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, Costa Rica soon to follow suit, and even the city of Lima in Peru is going to have its own commission. In the UK, London’s mayor, Boris Johnson, has launched a health inequalities strategy, supported by Sir Michael Marmot’s team, who worked on the international Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Perhaps it is an idea whose time has come – as Sir Michael has put it: ‘every sector is a health sector’.</p>
<p><em>Sources</em>: Rio Political Declaration, 21 October 2011; Bupa Foundation seminar on ‘Motivating change: working towards a healthier society’, 24 October 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/social-determinants-rise-up-the-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking with tradition?</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/breaking-with-tradition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/breaking-with-tradition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In China, smoking and wedding receptions have for many years gone hand in hand – not only is wine expected to be served, with the bride and groom toasting each table of guests, but the bride is often also expected to light a cigarette (preferably of a leading brand) for each male guest. However, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In China, smoking and wedding receptions have for many years gone hand in hand – not only is wine expected to be served, with the bride and groom toasting each table of guests, but the bride is often also expected to light a cigarette (preferably of a leading brand) for each male guest. However, this tradition is being threatened by the new ban on smoking in enclosed public places, which came into force earlier this year – and, most recently, by a Center for Disease Control and Prevention campaign to encourage tobacco-free weddings in Shanghai Municipality and several provinces including Zhejiang, Jiangxi and Shandong.</p>
<p>This has been met with considerable resistance, however. Of the 200 couples reached by the campaign, only a few promised to hold non-smoking ceremonies, because – even among social groups who are fully aware of the health threat from tobacco – they feared losing face, or parental opposition.</p>
<p>More awareness-raising is being planned, perhaps including having celebrities to champion the no-smoking cause, or broadcasting tobacco-free weddings on the internet.</p>
<p>While there is still a very long way to go – cultures change only slowly – even these small steps are to be commended in a country where the majority of men still smoke.</p>
<p><em>Source</em>: Xinhuanet.com, 5 October 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/breaking-with-tradition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluating workplace health</title>
		<link>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/evaluating-workplace-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/evaluating-workplace-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c3health.org/?p=2675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new initiative has been announced in the United States to establish a comprehensive national workplace health programme that will both improve the health of workers and their families, and also reduce health-care costs. It will focus particularly on innovative ways of tackling smoking, increase physical activity, and improve nutrition.
The Centers for Disease Control has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new initiative has been announced in the United States to establish a comprehensive national workplace health programme that will both improve the health of workers and their families, and also reduce health-care costs. It will focus particularly on innovative ways of tackling smoking, increase physical activity, and improve nutrition.</p>
<p>The Centers for Disease Control has awarded a $9 million grant to establish the programme, selected through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and it will be delivered by Veridian Health Management. Veridian will work with small, medium and large companies, using funds to assist each participating employer to implement a core set of WHP programme elements, and each employer will receive a full-service wellness programme for the two years of the intervention. Veridian’s president, Brenda Schmidt, noted that the project will also build community partnerships both to enhance programme activity and also to set up the knowledge transfer that will help to make the programme sustainable.</p>
<p>The Research Triangle Institute, based in North Carolina, will evaluate the programme, including capturing best practice and documenting challenges and strategies to overcome them.</p>
<p><em>Sources</em>: Stone Hearth News, 4 October 2011 and CDC website (here: <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/nhwp/index.html">http://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/nhwp/index.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.c3health.org/alerts/alerts-governmentaction/evaluating-workplace-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

